Home Home   |   Library   |   Gen'l Search   |   Articles   |   Judges
  Minnesota | Wisconsin | World
User Name   Password  
  Options   Awards   Reviews   More about LawMoose...  
Home Categories:
Minnesota & Local Law
Minnesota & Local Government
Federal Law
Federal Government
Other U.S. States & Jurisdictions
Legal Reference
Legal History
Legal Education & Careers
Legal Topics & Problems
Litigation & ADR
Forms & Documents
Minnesota Lawyers
Minnesota Law Firms
Pro Bono & Pro Se
Spanish, Hmong & Somali Language Legal Resources

Minnesota Legal Reference Library
Search the Library:          search tips

Library Home
Employment and Labor Law


Resources in this category:
   Everybody Likes a Tattletale?: The Minnesota Supreme Court's Elimination of the "Public Policy" Requirement for Whistleblower Protection in Anderson-Johanningmeier by Buethe, Neal T. (October 28, 2002) (William Mitchell Law Review)
"Whistleblower protection, an exception to the general rule of at-will employment, has been in effect in Minnesota since 1987. ... The Minnesota Supreme Court [in Anderson-Johanningmeier] has now eliminated the public policy requirement."

Discusses the whistleblower statute, prior case law, the Anderson-Johanningmeier, and its implications.

"[The decision] is more likely to cause the legislature to revisit the question of whether it intends Minnesota whistleblower protection to be significantly more comprehensive in its protection of employees than that provided under federal law and the common law of other states." 26 pages.

   Fresh Incentives to Whistle While You Work: Whistleblower Claims After the Abraham and Anderson-Johanningmeier Cases by Gray, Peter & Tanick, Andrew W. (April 1, 2002) (Bench & Bar of Minnesota)
"In a pair of opinions handed down within weeks of each other at the start of this year, Anderson-Johanningmeier v. Mid-Minnesota Women's Center, Inc., and Abraham v. County of Hennepin, the Minnesota Supreme Court made life a good deal easier for plaintiffs bringing suit under Minnesota Statutes Section 181.932--the so-called 'Whistleblower Act.'"

Discusses the right to a jury trial for whistleblowers seeking damages and elimination of the public policy requirement.

   The Whistleblower Blog (Minneapolis Star Tribune)
The newspaper would like people to "blow the whistle" by alerting the newspaper We provide this link to inform you of the option without recommendation pro or con.
   What's Next for Whistleblowers? by Tanick, Marshall H. (February 1, 1999) (Bench & Bar of Minnesota)
"1998 may go down in the annals of Minnesota jurisprudence as the Year of the Whistleblower."

Reviews recent cases. Describes impediments to whistleblower claimants' success: difficulty reaching settlement with hostile former employers, causation, difficulties proving motivation for termination, the whistleblowers' own improprieties, pre-emption by the Human Rights Act, differing remedies and limitations periods available under different theories, and uncertain outcomes when whistleblowers' claims are actually taken to trial.

   Government Accountability Project
   Minnesota Whistleblower Law: An Employer's Perspective by Thompson, John D. (Oberman Thompson & Segal, LLP)
2006. 11 pages.
   U.S. Office of Special Counsel
"The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) is an independent federal investigative and prosecutorial agency. Our basic authorities come from three federal statutes, the Civil Service Reform Act, the Whistleblower Protection Act, and the Hatch Act.

OSC's primary mission is to safeguard the merit system by protecting federal employees and applicants from prohibited personnel practices, especially reprisal for whistleblowing."

See also:
  • Similar resources in our Wisconsin Legal Reference Library
  • Top  

    Search the Library:           Library Home

    Please suggest a new category, a new item for this category, or improved categorization. Tell us about dead and changed links!

    We hope you find our Public Edition to be useful.

    But we want you to know that our best and most useful material is provided only by subscription.

    Our Enhanced Subscriber Edition turns you into a far more efficient, more effective user of the vast legal and governmental resources scattered across the Web as well as those that comprise the heart of Minnesota-specific legal and governmental resources and law-practice related knowledge.

    Call us or contact us through the site to learn how your firm or organization can put the full power of our Minnesota Law Practice WebSM at your service.

    Powered by LawsaurusTM expert support system software from Pritchard Law Webs.

    Home | About LawMoose | Ask Us to Contact You | Send Us Feedback | Terms & Conditions
    © 2000-2022 Pritchard Law Webs, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Ph. 612-332-0102. All Rights Reserved.
    LawMoose, Laugment, Laugment Relationship Language, LawSaurus, Home of the Minnesota Legal Web, Minnesota Law Practice Web, Home of the Wisconsin Legal Web, Wisconsin Law Practice Web, LawMoose World Legal Resource Center, MooseBoost, and Lawyer Selector are service marks of Pritchard Law Webs.